March 25, 2022
View this email in your browser

Amateur Experts

It’s become fashionable to dispense advice far outside one's expertise. Even presidents opine on the use of bright lights, bleach, and horse medicine to cure covid. As is usually the case, Donald, most such advice is better left unsaid.

This is not new. For example, when I was in practice, more than one client asked me to “put their kids on title” so that they could save money on probate. Usually they got this idea from the internet, or from a local seniors' magazine, or a friend trying to be helpful. Sometimes it made sense to do so, but rarely.

Let’s look at some scenarios and test this idea.

Jim and Elsie have recently retired. They’re selling their home in the city and buying their dream home on the lake. Somebody has suggested that they should also put their two kids, Susie and Bobbie, on title as joint tenants so that “when something happens to Mum and Dad”, the kids will just inherit the lake property automatically without the need for probate and paying the hated probate fees.

Background: the purchase price was $750,000. Bobbie lives in California, while Susie lives in Ontario and is on her third marriage, which doesn’t look any more viable than the first two. She has substance abuse issues, and can’t hold down a job. Bobbie and Susie have little relationship beyond having the same parents.

Scenario A: Title is put into the names of the parents only. Twenty years later, "something happens to Jim and Elsie". To be precise, they are eaten by the infamous Christie Lake Shark. The cottage falls into the estate, and is appraised at $1,750,000. Given that the cottage was Jim and Elsie's principal residence, there is no capital gains tax. The executor pays nearly 1.5% probate tax of about $26,000. Total. She then liquidates, and distributes the proceeds.

Scenario B1: Same story, except that title HAD been put into all four names. Since neither Bobbie nor Susie had ever lived in the property, they could not claim it as their principal residence, and capital gains tax accrued to them. On a total gain of a million dollars, the two kids would face a tax bill of over $50,000 each on their share, that is, over $100,000 in total. So much for avoiding the hated $26,000 probate fee.

Scenario B2: Susie’s fourth marriage collapses, this time the spouse is a litigious, “take no prisoners” SOB who sues her for half her interest in the cottage. Whether he wins, or not, there is a scorched-earth battle with a lis pendens order preventing any dealing with the cottage in the meantime. Legal costs covered by Jim and Elsie's savings.

Scenario B3: Bobbie’s software business goes belly up, owing creditors tens of millions of dollars, most of which Bobbie has personally guaranteed. The creditors, or the trustee in bankruptcy, go after his interest in the cottage. The Bank of Mom and Dad steps in to fix things.

Scenario B4: After the Christie Lake Shark episode, Susie and Bobbie now own the cottage as joint tenants. Susie and her biker boyfriend "Ti-Rex", decide to move in. Bobbie demands that it be sold. You take it from here. (Spoiler alert: the cast of characters will include law enforcement and TV crews.)

Those last four scenarios are just four of dozens of variations, none of which reflect very well on the “put the kids on title” free advice.

Scenario C: Elsie calls into the office to advise that Jim had been eaten by the Christie Lake Shark, and that just the day before she had been given a terminal diagnosis, with a maximum of three months to live. She says that Susie was now single, dry, and sober, and that Bobbie and Susie are now the best of friends and agree on everything. Would it be a good idea to put the kids on title? I tell her I’ll swing around on the weekend with the paperwork.*

Experts and professionals are experts and professionals for a reason. They know about estate planning issues, or soil load factors, or the combustion point of various materials, or tension-compression factors on bridges, and many other things which if violated can cost lives and fortunes.

So, even if you’re everybody’s "Favorite President", let’s leave the horse pills in the barn and the technical advice to the pros.


* Yes, the capital gain issue remains, but for the short period of time Bobbie and Susie are going to be on title, it will be inconsequential
Forward to a friend

Can I help you or your organization? Contact me at or at 613-862-3489. 

Friday Briefing Archives


An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them.

Werner Heisenberg

Having the data is not the same as having the expertise to look through the data - if it were, everybody with a smartphone would be a doctor or a scientist.

Abhijit Naskar

What I Do

I am an explainer, that is, I deconstruct complexity and re-frame it in understandable terms.

In particular, I explain the secrets of professional success-- things I wish I had known as a beginner lawyer in 1981, but which I had to learn by trial and error (and the occasional epiphany).

Simple yet profound, these secrets are really just specific applications of common-sense life lessons. They are the keys to true professional satisfaction and financial success.

Call me at 613-862-3489 or e-mail me at

© Norman Bowley 2022, all rights reserved.
Your privacy is important to me. I never rent, sell, share your email address – ever!

This e-mail is coming to your in-box because you subscribed. If it just shows up without permission, please scold it, delete it, and tell us. We support and do our absolute best not to offend the Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL), more formally known as "An Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act." If you tell us that we sent this e-mail to you in error, your name will be struck from our list in an instant, with our abject apologies.

You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.


This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Purposeful Communications · 239 Somerville Drive · Perth, Ontario K7H 3C6 · Canada

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp