View this email in your browser
Jorge Arango's

No. 41

Earlier this year, I read a fascinating book called Fatal Discord. It's a dual biography of Erasmus of Rotterdam and Martin Luther, two men who were central actors during a time of great upheaval in Europe. Religious tensions, which had been building over time, gave way to violence. Societies changed abruptly; peoples' ways of being in the world were upended. The Catholic Church — which up to then had set the structure for most Europeans' lives — lost its authority in large parts of the continent. It was a time of great disruption, and it didn't come without suffering.

This change was in no small part due to the introduction of a new technology: the printing press. The ability to quickly and cheaply produce books and pamphlets made it easier for ideas to spread. People started reading and writing more — and not just about religion. Scientific and political revolutions also followed. The introduction of this technology in the 15th Century influenced the shape of the world we've inherited.

From our distance in time, we can look back at the changes wrought by the printing press and declare they were a good thing — or not. But the people who were living through the turbulence unleashed by the technology couldn't be dispassionate about it. It was their families, livelihoods, and societies that were being re-configured — often against their will. These folks probably had strong opinions about the technological innovations that were upending their world (if they were aware of them at all.)

Now we, too, are living through a time of great technological transformation. As a result, we're now questioning long-standing institutions and ideas: the structure of our economies, the balance between privacy and security, the responsibilities of the individual and the collective, and more. For many among us, these changes will be painful. Will we reject the technologies that are precipitating these changes? Or can we be dispassionate enough to leverage the power of new technologies towards humane ends?

Also worth your attention...

The Informed Life With Chris Chandler

Episode 20 of The Informed Life podcast features a conversation with my friend Chris Chandler. Chris is a partner at strategic software design and development studio Philosophie, and a self-described "agilista." Our conversation centered on how designers — especially those working in agile environments — can embrace an ethical approach to their work.

Chris makes the point that it’s difficult to have conversations about ethics when we don’t share the same underlying frameworks. How do we deal with this? Chris has found an answer in existentialism, especially the work of Simone de Beauvoir. This conversation is worth your while — especially if you design software.

The Informed Life Episode 20: Chris Chandler on Design Ethics

Thanks for reading!

-- Jorge

P.S.: If you like this newsletter, please forward it to a friend. (If you're not subscribed yet, you can sign up here.)

P.P.S.: If you haven't done so already, please check out my book, Living in Information: Responsible Design for Digital Places. You can buy it from my publisher, Amazon, and other fine purveyors of the printed word.

Disclosure: this newsletter includes Amazon affiliate links.

Copyright © 2019 Jorge Arango, All rights reserved.

Jorge Arango
P.O. Box 29002
Oakland, CA 94604

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp