Insurance Law Alert
View this email in your browser
New Law on Expert Witness Testimony in Missouri
Missouri Governor Eric Greitens signed into law in late March a bill which will take effect August 28th in Missouri state courts.
The law will require Missouri state courts to follow the standards set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held over 20 years ago that expert testimony in federal courts must meet certain guidelines for admissibility. Under Rule 702, Federal Rules of Evidence, a witness who is qualified as an expert by his or her knowledge, skill, experience, training or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if the expert's scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact at issue, the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data, the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.
State court trial judges now become gatekeepers admitting or excluding  proffered  evidence based on whether it will meet the newly enacted evidentiary standard. This  bill  is  viewed  as a tort reform measure  in Missouri.  Opposition to the enactment  of this bill has been that Daubert  hearings  on evidentiary  issues may clog court dockets and slow down civil cases from getting through    trial.
Until the enactment of this bill, Missouri courts have allowed expert  opinion  testimony of  a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the field in forming opinions or inferences  upon the subject and if they are otherwise reasonably reliable. This bill is viewed as  raising  the  standard  of  admissibility  to a higher level.
Kansas previously modified its statutes to mirror the standards set forth in the Daubert holding. Before doing so, Kansas followed the holding in Frye v. United States, which provided that expert opinion must be based on scientific technique only where the technique is generally accepted as reliable in the relevant scientific community. Once Daubert was decided however, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the Federal Rules of Evidence superseded Frye as the proper standard for admissibility. 

If you have any questions regarding this case or any other insurance law issues, please contact one of our Insurance Law attorneys at 816.931.2700.
Follow Us: 

Contact Us:


Kent M. Bevan

Copyright © 2017 Dysart Taylor Cotter McMonigle & Montemore, P.C., All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp