Smart home company Insteon has shut off its servers, lost its management team, and on Thursday sent an email to customers explaining how it plans to sell any remaining assets to help pay off creditors as part of a formal dissolution of the business. It has been the most drama-filled end of a consumer IoT company to date — and also represents one of the biggest opportunities left for the Matter smart home standard going forward.

On Friday, April 15, customers started reporting that their Insteon app was down and their hubs could no longer communicate with the cloud. After reading those reports, I went online and discovered that, according to their LinkedIn bios, no one from the SmartLabs/Insteon management team was still working at the company.

Three of them had stripped the company name from their bios altogether, including Rob Lilleness, the former CEO. Lilleness founded Richmond Capital Partners, the company that invested $7.3 million in Insteon in 2017 with the idea of capitalizing on interest in smart homes. After I reached out to him on Saturday and reported the original story, he truncated his name on LinkedIn to R. Li. On the following Tuesday, he responded to my original inquiry by replying to me on LinkedIn saying, “Unfortunately, I am not involved with the company.”

By that time he also had taken his name, photo and bio off LinkedIn, appearing only as an anonymous LinkedIn member.

His statement to me was true, because as customers learned via email two days later, Insteon’s parent company SmartLabs had transferred its assets to a separate legal entity on March 22 called SmartLabs (ABC) LLC. SmartLabs ABC is a legal entity created to sell any assets and pay off the original SmartLabs' creditors.

As part of that process, the new LLC contracted with a company to collect claims, and on April 12 issued a letter telling companies that have a claim on SmartLabs/Insteon to file them before Sept. 18, 2022.

SmartLabs ABC may have some assets to sell, including the source code that many customers would like to see made available, but the idea that Insteon will continue as a sort of going concern for anything but the most tech-savvy users is misplaced. A connected product is far more than its source code.

While a company might buy the SmartLabs code and host it, it’s unclear why a buyer would invest in paying for Amazon servers, continued updates, and the skills necessary to rebuild all of the integrations without the promise of some sort of new revenue. This also assumes that some of the more valuable integrations, such as those that link to Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant, would be approved by the larger companies.

After such a public shutdown of the Insteon service, many customers are likely to cut their losses as opposed to paying a new company to restart the service. We have offered a list of potential alternatives to keep some Insteon gear limping along. But many of those options require a level of comfort with smart home services such as Home Assistant, HomeBridge, HOOBS, or other DIY smart home tools.

Casual users of Insteon gear will likely look at ripping and replacing what they can. The good news is there's an option on the horizon that can help. Matter, a smart home protocol championed by Google, Apple, Amazon, and Samsung (as well as hundreds of other companies in consumer IoT) is expected later this year.

The standard will create an interoperable data model for a selection of devices such as locks, lightbulbs, and HVAC equipment that will enable any Matter-certified devices to talk to them. Which means that if one Matter-certified hub stops working, a consumer can easily swap it out for a new one that can work with peripheral Matter devices.

Because the Matter standard isn’t actually here yet, this is all still theoretical. But the problem it could solve is very real. Insteon is only the latest example of a smart home company going out of business and stranding its users. We’ve also seen the death of early hubs and gear built by retailers such as Lowe's and Staples.

We’ve also seen some connected device companies try to restart with a subscription model, as Wink did. That said, because Insteon's technology used proprietary wireless radios to communicate among light switches, garage door openers, and other products, the loss of its service is a bit more complicated. Whereas companies such as Universal Devices have licensed the radio technology, so we could see new options that work with the stranded devices. But if a smart home is what you’re after, there are still no guarantees that anything you buy will stand the test of time.

Maybe Matter will change that. Then again, maybe it won’t.

The Impinj platform allows businesses to track all kinds of assets and inventory with small, battery-free RAIN RFID tags. By knowing where anything is located at any time, companies gain the insight and flexibility they need to thrive in an ever-changing world. That's why companies around the world are using RAIN RFID to solve their toughest challenges.

Want to connect everything? Learn what’s possible.

LoRaWAN network provider Senet said this week that it has expanded its relationship with the Helium network, a distributed peer-to-peer LoRaWAN network. Senet had started letting its customers roam onto the Helium network in September of last year, but with this move Senet has expanded the deal to include Helium’s global hotspots. And that means Senet customers can roam onto Helium’s network anywhere in the world.

Amid the bankruptcy of Sigfox and the creation of an alternative Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN) with Amazon’s Sidewalk, Senet has been plugging away, trying to build out a viable LPWAN business connecting IoT devices at prices that make sense. Helium has become a valuable part of that effort.

Many of Senet’s customers are water or municipal utilities. They either hire Senet to build out a network locally and operate it themselves, or hire it to build out a network locally and let Senet operate it and sell it back to the utility as a service. If the utility operates the network itself, it will often also use the Senet network for other smart city use cases.

If Senet provides the network as a service, it also opens up that network to other clients, effectively building out an IoT network financed by customers. Since many IoT devices benefit from cheap connectivity costs, spreading the costs of a network across multiple customers and reducing the capital costs associated with building out that network are essential.

Helium’s big business break came when it built out a low-cost IoT network by incentivizing consumers to buy and operate LoRaWAN hotspots in their homes and businesses in exchange for Helium Network Tokens (HNTs), a cryptocurrency generated by providing proof of network coverage. So far, Helium has seen the network expand to almost 750,000 hotspots, providing a pretty large swath of coverage. 

But the Helium network is consumer-grade, and doesn’t have the service-level agreements related to availability and uptime that some business customers require. That’s where Senet steps in. Bruce Chatterley, the CEO of Senet, told me that his network uses the Helium network as a way to get customers onto a LoRaWAN network quickly, as needed, before Senet builds out a “carrier-class” network, as well as to densify existing network coverage.

In New York City, for example, where Senet operates a LoRaWAN network designed to track food trucks in the city’s five boroughs, adding the Helium network enabled 25% more devices to come online. In addition to roaming, fast coverage, and density, the Helium network lets Senet see areas where it should build a carrier-class network overlay.

For example, if a shipping center adopts LoRaWAN sensors in a small town using Helium’s network, Senet can see the traffic and then come in to build a more reliable network that it can offer to the shipper. This ensures that Senet’s capital expenditures are allocated in places where demand already exists.

Chatterley also said that Senet handles the buying of data credits on the Helium network for its clients, and that Senet doesn't directly pass along those charges to its clients. Thus, with these deals Senet has become what is likely a significant consumer of data credits on the Helium network. And for those wondering, Chatterley told me that, for now, he doesn’t pay much attention to the price of HNTs, although that may change because Senet plans to start hosting hotspots in places where it builds out coverage. He expects HNTs and the value of those tokens to help defray some of the costs associated with building the network, but not contribute meaningfully to revenue.

Outside of the Helium deal, Chatterley sees the market for LoRaWAN connectivity expanding as it becomes more apparent that LoRaWAN is an open, available standard that’s reliable and no longer tied solely to a single chip provider.

A few months back, Senet signed an agreement to start providing satellite coverage as a backup to LoRaWAN connectivity in parts of the world where there is no LoRaWAN coverage. Chatterley told me that in the coming year or two, he expects to see more companies adopt LoRaWAN as a connectivity option.

I think he's right, but I actually think we'll see more companies adopt other forms of LPWANs — either with Amazon's Sidewalk or with cellular options such as NB-IoT or even LTE Cat-M — simply because the costs of connectivity and modules are coming down, while the ROI of having more information about things is going up.