Relatable characters ~ crafting external plots ~ new books and reviews ~ five links ~ and my cat.
View this email in your browser

In Which I Disagree with Maggie Nelson on Relatability. 

The Spring 2016 issue of Rattle magazine features an interview with the writer Maggie Nelson, who won massive acclaim in 2015 for her adult memoir The Argonauts. In the interview, she says: 

My mom teaches adult book groups, which is what I was getting at in saying that she came back around the long way to her background in literature. A lot of the time she teaches international literature, and some of her book groups, which are often full of white folks in the Bay Area with time and money to spend on book groups, will tell her, “I can’t relate.” Which you also get a lot in the undergraduate classroom. And my mom sometimes has to read them the riot act, tell them that relating is not the number one thing you’re looking for in the reading of literature. Which is back to this question about universalist projects. Often a lot doesn’t change when you just keep telling someone, for example, “I can’t relate to your experience with cops, that’s not my experience.” Well, that’s fine, listen to what they’re telling you about what their experience with cops is like and you might learn that it’s not equally distributed. You don’t learn anything by just insisting that your experience be the template for all others, but that’s a very common position for people, especially those in power who don’t want to hear. 

“Tell them that relating is not the number one thing you’re looking for in the reading of literature.” This sentence caught my attention, in part because this passage appears in The Magic Words:

About every six months, regular as the seasons, we see an upsurge of an old argument in the literary community about whether protagonists need to be “relatable.” Many adult literary novelists take offense at the very idea, saying that, as artists, their highest calling is fidelity to reality as they see it, and reality includes a large number of unpleasant people. (These people sometimes include adult literary novelists.) Some readers dismiss a protagonist as “unrelatable” if the character’s groundwork differs from theirs—their gender, skin color, sexual orientation, or country of origin. Those people are bad readers. Other readers—perhaps the vast majority of the casual reading public—just look for protagonists to be “likable,” which usually means the protagonist is a pleasant person who acts in a manner the reader regards as right. Such inoffensive characters allow readers to slip unobtrusively into their skins and enjoy the action of the book. 

I fall in the middle of this continuum, as I do feel strongly that if you’re writing fiction, especially for children or young adults, your protagonist should be relatable. But what makes a character relatable, in my view, is that the person is a full and credible human being, with all the strengths and vulnerabilities that implies: a love for something that can be taken away; a body, prone to embarrassment, injury, pleasure, and lust; fear of loss, of failure, of death; goofiness, stubbornness, blind spots, private jokes; a mind and heart unique in all the world. As a human being, I have all of these traits, so if an author can show me these qualities (or hundreds of other possible traits) operating realistically within a character, I’ll believe in and relate to that person. I might not like this person, particularly if she’s whiny or mean, but if I recognize the humanity in her, I can relate to her. When I can’t relate to a character, it’s usually because her emotions or vulnerabilities feel hidden from me somehow; her qualities don’t cohere in a credible manner; or she hasn’t been drawn with this much dimensionality altogether.

Why does relatability matter in children’s and young adult fiction? Well, pleasure can come from a number of factors in adult literary fiction—beautiful writing, a strong plot, an exploration of an idea or emotion, a connection to a character. But children’s and YA fiction operates a little differently. Child readers might not always appreciate lyrical writing because they’re struggling simply to decipher the words. Both child and YA readers like strong plots, but plots matter only because of characters—because we worry about our protagonist and we want to see her achieve her desire. We won’t worry about someone we don’t care about. Moreover, as children’s and YA books usually focus on a character’s emotional growth as he or she comes to a better understanding of the world, we readers need to be invested in the protagonist to want to see that growth happen. All of these factors point toward one conclusion: Whatever the other pleasures your novel offers, in children’s and YA publishing you need a protagonist who will capture the interest of readers—someone to whom they can relate.  

So I differ from Ms. Nelson in that I do think the reader’s ability to establish an emotional connection with a character — e.g., relatability — is important in children’s and YA literature, perhaps even “the number-one thing” in literature, to use her term. (This might also be a difference between children’s/YA and adult literature, I acknowledge.) But as I thought about the whole of what she was saying, I realized that we almost always talk about “relatability” in literature as if it’s entirely the writer’s responsibility to create a person relatable to the reader. But the reader must be willing to be part of that relationship—to listen to what the character has to offer, and to be open to the character holding some truth beyond the reader’s personal experience. An unwillingness to listen, or a lack of that openness, is what makes someone a bad reader, as I say in the first paragraph above. I think children are quite often the best readers, because they have just enough understanding of the world to know what’s real vs. not-real (they’re great bullshit detectors, in short), while the rest is all openness to narrative and human possibility. 

A relationship always requires effort on both sides. If one of your beta readers complains that your character isn’t relatable, it’s always good to look at the character to see if he’s believable and where his vulnerabilities are shown on the page, to be sure those elements are coming out as you intend; but you might also suss out if that reader is willing to work. If they aren’t, find better readers. 

Agree? Disagree? I’ll post this on my blog later this week; feel free to come and argue with me and Maggie (in abstentia) there. Happy writing this month!


Q&A of the Month

Anyone who preorders The Magic Words is welcome to send up to three questions to, which I will answer here or on my blog. Thank you for your interest!

What are some tips for developing a good external goal and action plot that feels authentic to the character and the emotional plot? Backstory: I've gotten feedback that my middle-grade novel needs more action. The internal goals and emotional plot are working well (in part, it's the story of a developing friendship), but my character doesn't have a solidly defined external goal to craft an action-based plot around. I've been working on it, but the goal and resultant plot always end up feeling forced. Any advice? — Molly

Hi Molly,

Thank you for preordering The Magic Words! An externally focused desire/goal can be a great thing to get a character moving, but if that’s not feeling authentic to your protagonist, then I’d suggest coming up with an external plot that isn’t driven by her. (Which is also totally acceptable for creating action, if it’s a good conflict or mystery that still gets her involved in some way. The Hunger Games and Harry Potter both use this plot structure.) What does your protagonist love? Take that away. What does she hate? Have it move in next door. What other characters do you want to know or write more about? What trouble could they bring in to the protagonist’s life? Could there be some upheaval in her town or building that she (and her new friend?) could try to solve? Think about your character’s emotional plot and if there’s some dimension or nuance to it you want to explore in more depth -- some conflict within the friendship you're not quite digging into as yet. Could an external plot tease out this nuance or conflict in some way? 

Action happens when you have a thing that we care about, a change that thing is seeking, and an obstacle blocking the change. If you can get the protagonist involved in making the change and overcoming the obstacle, you should be able to create more action. Good luck. 
New Books Out This Month, Edited by Me:  

PRINCESS! FAIRY! BALLERINA! by Bethanie Deeney Murguia.  When three friends gather for a playdate, they have to decide: Will they play princess, fairy, or ballerina? It's the perfect setup for a royal, magical, graceful standoff, with a delightful (and slightly damp) ending . . . and the perfect book for the little kid in your life who embraces any of those roles, or, even, surprisingly, one who rejects all of them. (I thought of this book when I saw the Hot Dog ballerina online this week. Dance on, kid.) School Library Journal pronounced it “A surefire hit that should magically fly off the library shelves and emerge a royal success.”

SABOTAGE: THE RACE TO DESTROY HITLER’S ATOMIC BOMB. Neal Bascomb, the author of the award-winning The Nazi Hunters, returns with a stunning nonfiction adventure involving Nazis, nukes, fighting, failure, and everyday heroes, as a team of young Norwegian commandos plots to destroy the stock of heavy water needed for the Nazis’ nuclear bomb. School Library Journal liked this one, too; in a starred review, they said, “This excellent treatise on a little-known episode of World War II is a first choice.” If you’d like to do a parent-child book group, particularly for Father’s Day later this month (hint hint), pick up SABOTAGE alongside Neal’s adult book covering the same material, THE WINTER FORTRESS. 

The Magic Words also received its first review this week — a starred review from Booklist, which called it “an indispensable, authoritative guide to the act, art, and craft of creation.” Whew! To read the full review, click here; to preorder the book (which is hugely appreciated!), click here.

(Then send me a question so I can answer it next month.) 
Copyright © 2016, All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp