June 22, 2016 | Podcast | Open in Browser


Where Autonomy Leads
A Summary of Physician-Assisted Suicide Facts
California Bill Would Ultimately Erase Religious Schools
Church of England aims to agree to disagree over homosexuality
The daily tragedy that never reaches the cable news networks

Where Autonomy Leads

Yesterday, we argued that autonomy explains nearly everything about the cultural left. Today, we'll look at where that leads.

The first place that autonomy leads is to the extreme glorification of consent, often considered in a vacuum. Consent is a good thing, mind; but the informed part of consent rarely makes it into consideration these days.

Here's what we mean. Take a look at this story about somebody enraged about a game some dads have been playing recently. The game? Stacking Cheerios on the forehead of their sleeping baby.

The source of outrage? The baby did not consent.

As we argued yesterday, extreme views of autonomy lead directly to a view of consent that prevents parents from cutting their child's hair until the child is old enough to "consent." Fortunately, the author of the above story offers some guidance on why this view is not sufficient for raising children:

"...Kids are not good abstract thinkers, and they gather clues about life from the overall way they are treated. So yes, we should teach kids some concept of bodily autonomy and self-worth from a very early age. It makes sense to make it obvious to kids that their desires are important, that their bodies are not meant to be violated, and that they should be listened to.

"But if we are going to put this much emphasis on consent, from an age where a pre-verbal baby can indicate lack of consent by sticking out a foot, then we must also give children a basis for deciding whether or not it’s appropriate to give consent. Because kids don’t automatically know this! Why would they? Kids don’t know anything. Remember, they don’t want their poop cleaned away. They don’t want to be in their car seats on the highway. They are not reliable judges of how they should be treated. They must be taught, by people who love them, what is and is not good for them."

In short, we ought to teach children that their bodies are not meant to be violated, but we are also responsible for teaching our children what they should and should not consent to.

The second place where autonomy may lead? Polygamy.

The argument runs something like this:

  1. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage.
  2. The opinion of the Court left no available restrictions to the concept of marriage.
  3. The Court argued that marriage should not be "restricted" to one man and one woman.
  4. The Court's conclusion was incomplete: If you do not restrict the "man and woman" portion, there is no reason to restrict the "one and one" either.

This, of course, stems from what we've been talking about: autonomy and consent. If we as a society favor an individual's limitless self-determination, it is difficult to perceive a coherent moral system in which anything other than "consent" functions as an impetus to act or not act. What logical objection exists if we let these extreme versions of autonomy and consent persist?

A Summary of Physician-Assisted Suicide Facts

We've written about physician-assisted suicide numerous times, even recently. But just in case you wanted a quick fact-sheet, here's Joe Carter at The Gospel Coalition:

"Earlier this month a new law took effect that makes California the latest—and most populous—state to legalize physician assisted suicide. A similar law was passed last week by the Canadian parliament. Once approved, Canada will join Albania, Colombia, Japan, Switzerland, and the Netherlands in implementing nationwide laws allowing assisted suicide."

Read his "9 Things You Should Know About Physician-Assisted Suicide" here.

On the Blog

See More Blogs

Zubik Case Illustrates Importance of Christians Showing Up in Court to Fight

"One of the most talked-about Supreme Court cases of the year, Zubik v. Burwell, has drawn national attention to the plight of religious nonprofits at the hands of an overreaching federal government."

by Marissa Mayer

3 Examples of How California is Working to Eliminate Freedom of Conscience

"The freedom to act on your most deeply held convictions—or conversely—the freedom not to be forced to violate those convictions, is an American value. As a nation, we've prioritized the need to protect freedom of conscience, not just because it's constitutional, but because as Americans, we appreciate and accept each other's differences and sincerely held beliefs."

by Marissa Mayer

Latest News Releases

See More Releases

Obama Administration refuses to enforce federal law protecting freedom of conscience
Court rebuffs California’s attempt to stop church’s suit over abortion mandate
ADF to court: Stop California from forcing churches to cover abortion
ADF in the News

NCGOP hires spokeswoman for pro-HB2 group
The News & Observer
My Voice: Enact only policies that protect privacy
Argus Leader
Emerson Board of Education OKs transgender protection policy
North Jersey
More News

Consent in isolation grooms us for degradation
9 Things You Should Know About Physician-Assisted Suicide
The Gospel Coalition
Travelling solo down the bumpy road of IVF and single parenthood
The Sydney Morning Herald
UK surrogacy law - are we finally on the road to reform?
The Law Bans IVF For Veterans, But That Could Finally Change
No nation can fulfil potential if religious freedom denied: US
The Economic Times
Why same-sex marriage will pave the way to polygamy
Religion News Service
Same-sex marriage plebiscite will license hate speech, says Penny Wong
The Guardian
Chief Minister: Isle of Man abortion laws 'need changing'
BBC News
BMA votes to maintain opposition to assisted suicide
Christian Today
Where major religious groups stand on abortion
Pew Research Center
Politics Makes Abortion Training In Texas Difficult
How a California Bill Violates the Religious Freedom of the School I Lead
The Christian Post
The daily tragedy that never reaches the cable news networks
National Right to Life
California Bill Would Ultimately Erase Religious Schools
The Federalist
Objective, critical and pluralistic? Religious Education in non-faith schools
Law & Religion UK
Homosexuality and “hate speech”
Law and Religion Australia
Israeli Court Tells City To Remove Religiously Inspired Signs Directing Women To Wear Modest Clothes
Religion Clause
Pro-lifers turn to ECHR to stop gender-based abortion in Great Britain
National Right to Life
Air Force vet dragged from flag-folding ceremony for speech referencing ‘God’
The Washington Times
Court of Appeal challenge to abortion law in Northern Ireland
The Irish News
All 28 EU member states reach consensus on LGBT rights for first time
Pink News
The BMA should reject this latest attempt to push it neutral on assisted suicide and euthanasia
CMF Blogs
LGBTI Church of England congregation launched
Anglican Ink
'666' spray attack on cemetery in Burstwick
BBC News
Why pupils at Reading faith schools could lose free transport
Get Reading
Church of England aims to agree to disagree over homosexuality
The Guardian
Pregnancy clinic boss calls for abortion to be made freely available on demand
The Telegraph
How Christians Can Bear Gospel Witness in an Anxious Age
Christianity Today